Showing posts with label chet miller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chet miller. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Weekly Links (Week of Jan.4, 2010)

During our program, I used to annoy my classmates by constantly sending emails pointing to various links, stories and other content that related to the topics being discussed in class. In hopefully a less annoying manner, I plan to bring that content to this blog on a weekly basis.

One of the things Ram Baliga told us was that analytics would become one of the cornerstone technologies that MBA's should master in the 21st century. Here is a good write-up on the proliferation of data that is now available for analysis and how it will shape the future of business.

With Chet Miller we evaluated various employee evaluation models, including GE's A-B-C player model. This link explores NetFlix model of trying to hire, retain and compensate almost all "A" players and whether or not that is a good thing.

Following up from our case discussion about NetFlix and their eventual migration to a streaming model. Many elements at play here: short-term vs. long-term profits; customer input vs. decisions that lead to eventual business model changes; decisions that could lead to loses due to digital piracy or alternative models solving a customer demand.

This article explore the Nexus One phone from Google, in the context of how it will impact Google's overall strategy. VC Brian Gurley does an excellent job of looking at the broader impact of this device, but more importantly the strategic impact of the new business model. The Nexus One was an area of highlight in the final Global Strategy paper that I wrote with Ric Freeman and Wendy Perry.

Here's another Nexus One link that follows-up some of the cases we analyzed, including strategic challenges for HTC, Taiwan Semi-Conductor and Google. At least within the technology world, the spread of coopetition and partner/rival scenarios will continue to expand as the value chain is twisted in all sorts of new ways.

Stan Mandel taught us the underlying structures for funding and operating and entrepreneurial venture, but more so he focus on the mindset needed to be a successful entrepreneur. VC/Entrepreneur Mark Suster explorers his views of the characteristics of successful entrepreneurs.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Wrapping up the Program - Part II

Following up on Part I, I thought I would highlight some of my favorite projects from the program. Some were things that I was a part of, while others came from classmates. I've mentioned some of these before, in previous blog posts.

The first was the summary presentation we gave for Leadership & Organizational Behavior (LOB) class. The 1st semester was an interesting transition for everyone in the class, not only readjusting ourselves to academia but also transitioning into a structure where teamwork and trust were critical factors in success. The focus of the presentation was supposed to be analysis of our personalities against LOB criteria, but what it turned into was a very revealing look into the personalities of our classmates. Their history, their fears, their hopes and dreams, and their ability to trust the people in the room with personal information. For most people in the class, it was the first opportunity we'd had in 3-4 months to really understand who we'd be going through the rest of the journey with. For me personally, I used it as an opportunity to try out a presentation style that I had seen a few times, but had never used before. It's a variation on something called Pecha Kucha, which we eventually used in the 4th semester for our final Leading Change presentation. When I gave the presentation, I think I made some people uncomfortable (less structured, less formal, limited analysis). I was trying to use the style to convey the pace at which my working environment (Internet Technology) moves, and I believe that came across to some extent. Regardless, it was my first attempt at using the MBA program as a vehicle to try new ideas which could be reused in my working world.
Our final Business & Global Economics (BGE) project involved a country/region and investment analysis in Emerging Markets. BGE was the 1st semester course that really taught me that I had much to learn about the complexities and inter-dependencies of the global economy We choose to analyze UAE, which at the time of our selection (Aug.2008) seemed like an exciting, vibrant new beacon of the global economy. Our analysis and recommendation highlighted many of the possibilities being created by the massive influx of petrodollars, but it also cautioned against a potential bubble. Having new eyes for UAE, it has been extremely interesting to watch the reports of the demise of Dubai in the early to mid part of 2009, and then the more recent reports of its resurgence towards the end of the year. I believe the stories of Dubai, and its ultimate success or failure are still to be written, with results being somewhat unknown for another 5-10 years.

Towards the end of our 2nd semester, our Managerial Accounting professor (Dr.Bern Beatty) asked Brian Healy (EVP, Kindermusik) to come speak with our class about how they implement Open Book Management. Not only was this an excellent look at how an entrepreneurial company was putting unique leadership styles to work, but it also began a business relationship with Mr.Healy that I hope to leverage for another start-up that I may launch in 2010.
Another 2nd semester project allowed Portia Mount and I to explore an element of Marketing that gets heavy coverage from the press, but is still not well understood my most of the business world or academia. We explored Social Media and Social Marketing in the context of the Obama Election campaign, but tried to constantly bring the context back to everyday business environments. It was an interesting culmination to our Strategic Marketing course, as each sub-team also created a final presentation that focused on an angle of Internet or Social Marketing. Since that presentation, I've actually had 5-6 companies approach me about training/educating their executive teams about Social Media/Marketing best practices and way they can engage with this new media.
The 3rd semester was all about International Business. We had the option to focus on China, Japan or South America (the India trip was canceled due to the Mumbai bombings). Eight of us choose to spend two weeks in Beijing, Xian, Shanghai and Hong Kong. We chronically our journey on the China Blog. It's still difficult to put the magnitude of that trip into words, but needless to say it completely changed my views on my career and the 21st century.

To conclude our Entrepreneurship course, we were asked to focus on a new business model or idea. I decided to focus on Gracely Girl Designs, which is an online appearal business that I created with my wife in October 2009. The primary motivation for the business was to allow her a creative outlet to coincide with the raising of our children. But what we found in designing the business was an ability to operate almost entirely virtual and with a structure that was incredibly flexible. I presented this business as a model that could be adopted by classmates that wishes to stretch their entrepreneurial legs, but also maintain their existing jobs (at least for a while).
Our Management Practicum was focused around the theme of Environmental Sustainability, and how we could attack that problem in a way that found balance between environmental challenges and business challenges. Many of my classmates came up with incredible ideas (to be discussed in Part III), presenting ideas to start businesses that will have lasting impacts for thousands of people in the US, Latin America and India. Their work will go beyond business success and will thrive in the future successes of mankind. Our team took a technology focus, looking at ways to more efficiently deploy IT Data Centers, the 21st-century "bit" factories that will drive the output of electronic addictions. Considering that today's Data Centers consume 2-3% of all US electricity, with exponential growth expected as Smart Grids and Electric Vehicles become part of the US economy.

Looking back on the breadth of our projects, I'm still amazed at what can be learned in just 18 months. Not only did we develop domain-level expertise in many areas, but we created a framework of knowledge that will allow us to take on strategic challenges throughout the 21st century.


Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Connect the Dots - Networking your Social Networks

As I was flipping through HBR this evening, I came across an article about Social Networking, written by Alex "Sandy" Pentland.  Dr. Pentland runs the Human Dynamics group within the MIT Media Lab.  Back in the spring of 2007, I had the good fortune to meet Dr. Pentland, get to know about many of the really cool things being built within the Media Lab, and actually work on the project that is described in the paper.  My former company was a Media Lab sponsor and we co-funded some of the initial work in this area of dynamic social networking.  Needless to say, it was a nice surprise to see something you worked on (albeit slightly) published in HBR.

So what does this have to do with MBA programs?  Actually, quite a bit.  We covered social networks briefly in LOB with Dr. Miller, but only to the extent that people need to be aware of where the strong vs. weak links are within their companies.  Social networking came up again this weekend, during a discussion in our OpsMgmt class, as we discussed the connection between groups within the production process (product mgmt, engineering, production, etc..). What Dr. Meredith pointed out is that many times one of these groups will be outsourced, and then eventually other connected groups move as well because the communication channels break down over distances.  

This latter point seems to be proven out in Dr. Pentland's MIT research.  As much as I enjoyed using technologies like Telepresence, distance has consistently proven to be a huge barrier to effective communication and collaboration.  So why does this matter?  It matters if parts of your business are moving offshore, or great distances from where you are located.  Chances are, if that group is really important, then they are going to get tired of the communications breakdowns and look to move your function closer to them.  All the more reason for US companies to step up their efforts to bring expertise and skill-levels back up to competitive levels with the rest of the world. Unfortunately, it's more than just low-cost labor that might move jobs overseas.   

Thursday, January 1, 2009

1st Semester Summary - LOB (Part I)

Let's continue with the 1st semester recap and dive into the Leadership and Organizational Behavior (LOB) class, which was taught by Dr. Chet Miller.  While my grade didn't necessarily reflect that I understood this class extremely well, in hindsight I'd have to say that this class will probably prove to be one of the most valuable I take during my WFU MBA program.  I say that for a couple reasons:
  1. Dr. Miller brings so much energy and passion to every class that you can't help but have fun and be enthusiastic about trying to understands the concepts he's teaching.  His enthusiasm and delivery style definitely taught me the power of bringing energy to the room and allow people to gain strength from it.  It's something I need to better incorporate into my presentation style.  In addition, Dr. Miller was separated at birth from NBA coach Rick Carlisle, and his style throughout a typical class is not unlike watching a basketball coach go through a game.  It starts up with a crisp coat and tie.  The tie quickly loosens as the teaching begins.  The coat comes off after the 1st period.  The sleeves are rolled-up after halftime and by the 4th quarter he's pacing the classroom encouraging the discussion to another level.  We often worried that he may pull something as he frequently "punched" the air or slid across the room to emphasize a talking point, but as far as we know he never went on the Injured Reserve list during the semester.  
  2. The core of this course is people and how they are organized, motivated, led or manipulated within a company structure.  It dives into optimal and flawed organizational structures.  We looked at personality traits and styles of leaders in different industries and levels of companies.  Leadership styles were examined in depth, to better understand what worked best under certain circumstances.  Motivation was studied in depth, in terms of compensation models, individuals vs. groups, goal settings and analysis of success.  And throughout the course, we were always reminded to balance our analysis of this content against analytic data, either through direct measurement or research in this field of study.  "So sayeth the data" was a mantra that we heard over and over, as "common sense", "intuition" or "gut feelings" were often proven to be in opposition to the previously mentioned analysis data.   
This course covered topics and business cases that I expect that I will refer back to time and time again throughout my career.  It taught us the value of creating systems that allow high commitment and high involvement management, and how to address people-specific issues within those systems.